Is there any other picture that better captures the Obama foreign policy? He's got the slight head-up tilt with the subtle s**t-eating grin knowing he's standing in front of a massive picture of the murdering Che while knowing he's supremely ticking off some of his real enemies in the process. Even if he's not consciously doing so, it fits.
But there he is, standing at attention representing the imperialist racist nation he's spent the last seven years tying to reform through 'hope and change'. That change was moving America away from a country that stood firm before tyrants and tinpots to one that feels their pain and never has a discouraging word. Imagine how Obama would have treated Saddam Hussein. Then consider how he treats the Tea Party and most Republicans. Ask Dinesh D'Souza who the true enemy is.
Now, there's nothing wrong with reaching out, as Nixon did with China, as Reagan did with the Soviets. But there is something to be said for maintaining national dignity and not giving away the store while doing so. That includes not standing there grinning in front of a f*cking Che mural.
Some may say this is just a strategy. Super smart three-dimensional chess Obama is just playing the commies. Well OK, but it needs to work. Consider that China and Vietnam are still communist countries. Donald Trump is getting a lot of traction talking about how China is manipulating their currency at our expense. 'Success' isn't just cheap electronic stuff. Hopefully.
No doubt the Chamber of Commerce types were among the biggest supporters of this outreach, who if asked will blow the trumpet about how these new markets will foster freedom while the dictator continues to round up dissidents. Actually, the people who stand to gain most from this new
One might think Democrats would not support this kind of thing in principle, but they have one prime principle and it's called 'winning'. Getting there is all part of those hazy shades of flexible gray. To them winning is helping their guy here. But stand back and look and it almost seems, in the hazy gray mist, that there's a tad bit too much warm fuzzy to some of the support, something kinda Bill Ayers-ish. Maybe it depends on the definition of winning.