So maybe you should consider going back in the hole and waiting until another Bush comes into power, or some other Republican.
After all, Mike Morell, the former second in command at the CIA, who helped propagate the lie that Benghazi was about a hateful video from an American practicing his first amendment rights, has said the Hersh story about bin Laden is "all wrong":
"I started reading the article last night, I got a third of the way through and I stopped, because every sentence I was reading was wrong. The source that Hersh talked to has no idea what he's talking about," Morell said.Every sentence! Even the ones where he admits the SEALs did a raid and shot bin Laden, apparently--wrong. Wrong, wrong wrong!
In the same CBS interview the same guy, Morell, apologized to former President Bush, er, no sorry, to former Secretary of State Colin Powell, for sending him over to the UN to lobby for taking out Saddam because..
"We said he has chemical weapons, he has a biological weapons production capability, and he's restarting his nuclear weapons program. We were wrong on all three of those," he said.So the CIA was 'all wrong'. But it's nice to see Mr. Wrong apologize to Mr. Wrong for being wrong. All of which makes Bush the wrongest. Wait, was Hillary Clinton all wrong when she characterized Pakistan as helpful in getting UBL:
She said: "In fact, co-operation with Pakistan helped lead us to Bin Laden and the compound in which he was hiding."Gee, that's exactly what Hersh said. But it's wrong! Wrong, wrong, wrong. Maybe Hersh didn't deserve those awards after all. Or maybe he does.
It's interesting to watch the mainstream media complain about Hersh's use of one anonymous source. Wasn't "Deep Throat" one anonymous source?
Anyway, this Eric Wemple blog post in the Post points out why this won't be a major story--it indicts the mainstream press. It also indicts the idea that waterboarding KSM helped find al-Kuwaiti, the courier Hersh's source claims doesn't exist. So there's reason for the right wing to scream 'wrong, wrong, wrong' on this as well. In other words, this is likely going nowhere, or the same place Hersh's story about Bashar Assad's use of (or not) chemical weapons went.
One thing the story claims is that the 'treasure trove' of information obtained in bin Laden's lair, CDs, memory sticks, etc, did not exist. Investigators have been grumbling about the slow-walk given to the data's release, well, why not release it now, to prove Hersh wrong? If there really are thousands of intelligence docs redact them, and release them.
Interestingly, neither the WaPo nor NY Times are front paging their stories at this moment, so you have to search the search bar. The Times' report is strange, as if giving some credence to Hersh's allegations. They also point out that an FBI agent described the 'treasure trove' in detail at a trial for an noted AQ figure some months ago, which means the government allowed him to perjure himself. Either that or Hersh's sources are full of BS. Or Hersh is actually a kook. Or the Obama administration is lying. Again.
Either way, it's certainly entertaining to watch the left throw their hero under the bus, even if gently in some quarters.
FUNNY, THAT 5/12/15
So far the only network news org that has at least partially confirmed Hersh's reportage is NBC News..
The broadcaster has corroborated Hersh's claim that the 'walk in' asset that revealed the vital information as to where bin Laden was hiding was in fact Pakistani.
The official US line, however, maintains that the CIA located him by tracking couriers to his walled in complex in Abbottabad, Pakistan. NBC News stated that it has 'long been pursuing leads about a walk-in', and that their own findings match those reported by Hersh.So NBC is on board. At least in print. At today's White House press briefing the only question NBC's White House correspondent Chris Jansing asked Josh Earnest was about getting Harriet Tubman on the 20 dollar bill. It may have been just me but Earnest seemed almost amused at such a giggly question. He had probably prepared for worse, but NBC saved him the trouble today.
Actually, watching the presser is like watching a White House lecture series with the professional reporters asking weaker questions than students might during a university lecture. When one reporter--the Fox guy--asked about an inconsistency in the Benghazi narrative Earnest shot back at him, causing many in the room to laugh at Fox. That's their idea of speaking truth to power.
Over at the State Dept there were no questions asked about it--just like yesterday. At the same time, many prominent political reporters have spent the past few days obsessing over Jeb Bush's inartful reply to Megyn Kelly's question about re-doing the Iraq war. It's really an amazing thing to witness.