A few days ago they had a post up attacking Financial Peace guy Dave Ramsey, basically criticizing him for advising that poor people develop good habits to assist their climb out of poverty. The writer hits back by suggesting that Ramsey doesn't understand the poor, then bashes him as a hypocrite for being wealthy, using passages from the Bible about wealth as cudgels. The writer ends the piece by saying..
God does not bless people with money; God blesses people with the good and perfect gift of God’s presence, which is available to rich and poor alike.Which is true. Which overturns her entire point about wealth, because if wealth alone were a disqualifier for entrance into Heaven it would be empty. Even the poor have to account for their financial choices. We will all be judged on how we act, not how much we made. Ramsey has helped thousands of people get out of debt. His radio words are hard to listen to in a sea of political bickering, but very much needed.
Now today the Belief Blog tells us that C.S. Lewis wasn't exactly a saint. Keep in mind both Ramsey and Lewis are heroes of the evangelical sect. Writer John Blake summarizes him as a perverted, drunken hypocrite who didn't take care of his house and eventually stopped his apologetics because he could no longer oratorically defend Christianity. Of course, Lewis himself has admitted to various personal iniquities, including an early life as an atheist, but very little context was provided.
Looking over Mr. Blake's writings on Belief Blog they do not appear to be over the top. A much needed look into the on-line world of arguing over religion was worthy. But digging a little deeper into his resume a few red flags appear.
For instance, he recently penned his own apologia over Obama's lie about health care, telling CNN readers that hey-- ALL presidents lie, including that guy Bush Junior who lied about WMDs, even though no lie was ever proved. The White House couldn't have written a more vile piece in defense. Blake explains the difference between 'unforgivable' and 'noble' lies. He doesn't pin either on Obama, giving that to history wink wink, O was just trying to get people covered so just sayin, but after discussing this he goes back to bash Bush again, then tells us we indeed need a president who can lie.
Here's another gem. Right before the 2012 election Blake wrote a well-crafted screed linking Obama with Nineteenth Century racism. Clever writers are subtle in their point; Blake was trying to bring an image of a beleaguered mixed race president suffering the daily slings and arrows of racism just like his predecessors during reconstruction, despite Obama himself being fairly well-insulated from such cruelties for most of his life and the sheer unlikeliness of a black man even being on the presidential ballot during the Jim Crow era.
So in the final analysis the CNN Belief Blog could be seen as a cloaked political blog designed to knock down mainly right wing Christian apologetics via a post-modern search for religious truth, while engaging in their own form of apologetics in defending noted earthly figures. If someone were to judge them.