mostly Christian girls have been abducted by Islamic crackpots in Nigeria. That's what head-choppers do--remember Beslan? These are the same 'extremists' who attacked a mall in Nairobi last year and killed scores of innocents. They attacked a church early in the year but drew little outrage from political corners here.
Now we're all supposed to be outraged. The First Lady is holding a sign with a hashtag, looking glum. But wasn't it also terrible when the Islamic government in Sudan allowed the killing, raping and violation of human rights of non-Arabs in Darfur. By the way, where is George Clooney on this now? Were there White House hashtags on Darfur?
Those with keen memories may remember when 3 Americans were killed by elements of AQIM in Algeria last year for the crime of working at a gas plant. Of course it was tragic when 4 Americans were killed in an attack in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11 but wanting anything more on that story now qualifies a person as a conspiracy loon following a phony scandal. Maybe Obama will come on his broadcast Saturday holding a sign with hashtag phony scandal.
What about the past actions of Joseph Kony? Horrible. Definitely.
So all of the above brings up a question-- exactly what is Obama's policy on terrorism anymore? What triggers a response and what triggers silence or even cover-ups or outrage?
Well, he's sent troops to Africa--not to officially search and destroy AQ--but to look for Kony. We have a drone base or two there, but they seem to be pretty quiet. Now the Obama folks are prepared to send help of some description to find these girls, this after the Clinton State Department once resisted calling the terrorists terrorists. The killers of 7 Americans in northern Africa remain at large but they are being pursued by FBI gumshoes, not troops.
Meanwhile, AQ factions are fighting and committing atrocities in Syria and Iraq but that's a no go zone. Other terrorists are holing up in Yemen and are shot at by drones every other week. We're apparently bugging out of Afghanistan at the end of the year, although it's hard to know because any press reports from the front lines of the GWoT are rare. Reports of discussions with the Taliban come up every now and then.
So what are we doing? Is the plan to aimlessly fire at moles when they pop up, as long as the moles are isolated and may not cause collateral problems, or is there an overall strategy in play? We've been told the prez is one of the smartest men to ever hold office, so maybe it's just hard for mortals to understand. It certainly looks like the overarching strategy is ruled more by politics than anything else, but that would surely be a racist thought.