Saturday, March 25, 2006

Illegals demand their freedom

Illegal aliens and their supporters hit the streets Friday to protest the Senate's new bill, which would make their presence here a felony. For the record, I believe making illegal immigration a felony is pretty ridiculous as well, and probably represents an election year political stunt.

That doesn't mean I agree with Jeralyn Merritt and the like. Actually, their attitude is the reason these protests bother me.

For example, wonder if any of the marching illegals realized they were exercising a Constitutional right of assembly they do not possess in order to protest a legal action against them from the country they've entered illegally? Even if most of the marchers were legal residents it amounts to protesting on behalf of scofflaws.

But no stinkin' Gringo logic crossed this participant's mind:
"They're here for the American Dream," said Malissa Greer, 29, who joined a crowd estimated by police to be at least 10,000 strong. "God created all of us. He's not a God of the United States, he's a God of the world."
Wow, she has a copy of Hillary's Bible. Here's another puzzler:
Hundreds of the students, some carrying Mexican flags, walked down the middle of Los Angeles streets, police cruisers behind them.
Sounds more like the beginning of an insurrection. That sentiment was not confined to places like East LA, though. Over in peanutland (Georgia) the state is considering a bill that would strip away services from illegals and also slap a 5 percent surcharge on their wire transfers. Pretty clever, and sure to tick off Vincente Fox since it reduces his gross national product.

But alas, the press will focus on comments like these:
Jennifer Garcia worried what would the proposal would do to her family. She said her husband is an illegal Mexican immigrant. "If they send him back to Mexico, who's going to take care of them and me?" Garcia said of herself and her four children. "This is the United States. We need to come together and be a whole."
Simple solution, get your husband here legally, Ma'am.

But let's not forget that people like Ms. Garcia are able to make such statements because our system has permitted illegal immigration. Both government and business have looked the other way in the pursuit of their monetary and political goals, so it shouldn't be surprising that some people might be confused when authorities threaten to actually uphold the laws. But the law is just that. Both immigrants and citizens must respect it, or chaos results.

MORE 3/25/06

The protesters were out in force in LA again today. I realize Frist's felony law might ruffle some feathers, but don't these folks realize us gringos are already forced to select our own language when dialing customer service or grabbing cash from a teller machine? It's not like we haven't been somewhat accomodating.

Also, it appears someone reviewed the media coverage from yesterday and realized way too many Mexican flags were in the coverage. Today Old Glory was prominent in the press shots, like the one at the left from CNN. I'm not sure that's going to sway many folks, after all many of the marchers are still breaking the law simply by being there. But it takes some of the insurrectionist edge off the events.

Meanwhile, in his Saturday radio address Bush crystalized the problem when he said, "America is a nation of immigrants, and we're also a nation of laws,". So he drew a line but it was wavy, since he also called for "legislation that does not force America to choose between being a welcoming society and a lawful one." He'll probably use this to push his amnesty plan as a compromise position, forcing the left to speculate on whether Rove had a secret role in orchestrating the protests.

3/25 ONE FINAL THOUGHT

In an interesting piece about AQ and nukes, Arnaud de Borchgrave of the Washington Times speculates on why Bin Laden wants to bring a few kilotons to America:
What interests bin Laden and Zawahri beyond casualty lists is collateral damage to civil liberties, privacy and the world economy.
Therefore, if we juxtapose Bin Laden's goal with this statement from a illegal alien marcher in LA we find a paradox:
"As much as we need this country, we love this country," Salvador said, waving a stick with both the American and Guatemalan flag. "This country gives us opportunities we don't get at home."
Since a large percentage of the world depends on America for their livelihoods (including many Muslims and Arabs) an attack here would be pretty risky. Look at it this way, if 500k are marching in the streets just to stay here illegally, imagine how they might feel if Bin Laden takes their meal tickets away.

ATZLAN 3/27/06

All the illegal aliens toting signs and pointing to the fact they're actually the indigenous peoples in the land of fruits and nuts are proof of a failed education system, either here or in Mexico. Clearly they are unaware of their own Spanish heritage. I believe that would make many of them European by descent, right?

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

My sentiments exactly. This is just like the hundreds of thousands of 'illegal immigrants' that marched a few weeks ago in Chicago. I'm in Tennessee and posted on it. I had folks from Chicago commenting, saying they could not even get out of the city or out of the way of all those illegals. They were desparate and like me cannot understand the gaul of these illegals. They DEMAND that THEIR rights in the UNITED STATES be heard and that they are treated just like LEGALs.

I mean, that takes it all doesn't it? They don't obey our laws, but then they want protection UNDER our laws, geeze. Send them all home and make their country of origin pay the expenses.

We are going to be like Europe before long. As my friend in the UK says, "We are foreigners in our own land now and can do nothing about it."

A.C. McCloud said...

If we look at this in union terms, we've set precedence by allowing illegals to stream across the border and get jobs here without penalty. Once a precedence is set, people react as we saw Friday, even if they know their actions are against the law.

Draconian measures will lead to blood in the streets, which is probably why Bush was pushing the worker visa plan. Thing is, if the flood wave isn't stopped there will be blood in the streets at some future point anyway.

Jonathan said...

Unrelated to the post:

Damn choking Tigers! Didn't hit the first three-pointer until 13 seconds left in the game, when it was too late. I'm pretty pissed right now...

A.C. McCloud said...

They weren't anything near Tiger-like. Stiff, tentative and sloppy. UCLA is not that good, they were just that bad.
Maybe the predictions of them having too many freshmen finally came true.

LA Sunset said...

Amazing how different people view the same game and see two entirely different things.

From where I sit, UCLA's defense dictated the pace of the game. ;)

In fact if they can do that the rest of the way, they will win it all.

A.C. McCloud said...

All I know is that my bracket sheet went down in serious flames this weekend.

But you gotta love that George Mason...

Jonathan said...

UCLA's defense had something to do with missing wide-open layups and three pointers that Memphis had buried all season? I musta been watching a different game! ;-)

Still, UCLA shot ice-cold yet still won the game. They deserved to win, pure and simple.

LA Sunset said...

Jon,

The way I saw it, UCLA forced Memphis to take shots they didn’t want to take. They had hands in the passing lanes and wouldn’t relent. I will grant you that Memphis took some shots they should have hit, but by that time UCLA had gotten into their heads. Both teams played outstanding defense. Neither team got on a serious scoring run, of any real value. And if Memphis had been the ones scoring 50, they would have deserved to win, just as much.

But, I see where this is going Jon. Deep down, you Florida fans fear UCLA. Both the tradition and the defense intimidate you Gators. ;)

The sad thing in all of this is, we have bastardized this serious post with basketball trash talk. But just so AC knows, it wouldn’t hurt for him to throw up a basketball post once in a great while (seeing how it is tourney time). Then we could air this out in an intelligent and logical fashion without contaminating his journalistic endeavors ;)

Besides that, it might not hurt to practice a little sport writing. You never know when it may come in handy.

Because, when the leftists make this a socialist utopia we will no longer need to criticize anything political. Everything will be a perfect bliss. Anything political that will be written, will be written for us; and all we will realistically need to know is, how to drink massive amounts of liquor and argue unimportant things (just like the glory days of the Soviet Union). The state will take care of the rest. ;)