This new document goes over several items related to the laboratories that don't appear consistent with a weather station, such as vibration sensors and machines to measure X-rays.
I don't suggest to have the answer, but as a person having some knowledge of the weather business here's my two cents. First, the National Weather Service doesn't use hydrogen generators in their balloon-based upper air network (NWS balloon shown in picture, not Iraqi balloon), they use cylinders. Surely the Iraqis could have just as easily saved the trouble and done the same.
But even if they wanted mobile production capability, one of the commenters over at CQ had a good point:
If your planning on using air-burst chemical or biologic’s, you’d damned well better have good meteorological data/information of where the product is going to travel.Yes, fallout and dispersion rates are something you'd need to know about. For example, the NWS used to maintain a weather station in North Las Vegas at the Nuclear Test Site in support of the underground nuke tests.
If the vehicles could provide a ‘dual-use’ function of both gathering pre-battlefield data and/or be utilized in the production of chemical or biologic’s, you’ve a classic ‘two-fer.’
Whatever the case, these Iraqi "weather labs" weren't part of the World Meteorological Organization's network of official weather sites, which are fixed locations. It would be most interesting to find out more about the meteorological services of Iraq and whether these mobile units might have been used to help predict sandstorms, for instance. Otherwise, it seems more likely they would be used in support of military activies. More to come.
MORE, BUT NOT MUCH MORE 5/15/06
It's not easy to find a good history of Iraq's meteorological services using the standard search engines. The World Meteorological Organization isn't much help, either. Did find this, which relates to Iraqi Scud missile batteries:
Iraq established its Scud operational unit—Brigade 224 (Unit 224)—in 1976 following training and successful Scud firings under the supervision of Soviet experts. The unit ultimately consisted of three missile battalions, a technical battalion, a meteorology battery, and a maintenance and repair workshop.It's quite possible these mobile labs were used by meteorologists in support of Scud firings. As we know, missiles can be loaded with a host of agents, but that really doesn't the support the allegation these were bio weapons production labs.
MORE
Recapping the old LA Times story from 2003, the US Army itself had 19 mobile hydrogen generators for filling artillery weather balloons, although they were much more contained and efficient. The Army never used them in the field, since helium is the preferred gas to fill weather balloons. The NWS has used both helium and hydrogen in the past, exclusively from cyclinders.
It makes sense to think the Iraqis would want a self-contained unit for field operations rather than relying on cylinders, which might run out. However, this also makes sense:
The CIA noted that Iraq never declared the vehicles to United Nations inspectors, something they would have faced no risk in doing if they were truly for hydrogen production. CIA officials also said the design of the trailers was unnecessarily elaborate and cumbersome for hydrogen production.Certainly if these were mobile bio labs a cover story would be needed. Although my jury is still out pending any further information, right now the available evidence strongly points toward the cover story being accurate.
"If they wanted to produce hydrogen, they could have produced it more efficiently," said one CIA official, who noted that smaller, safer, portable systems are commercially available.
3 comments:
The comment about the US National Weather Service not using hydrogen generators is absolutely false! "The NWS upper-air network uses locally-produced hydrogen at all it's upper-air facilities whenever possible! The high cost of helium makes this a necessity. True, the hydrogen is stored in cylinders, as two/day balloon release require more gas than can be produced instantly on "as needed" basis!
Next-time, please do a bit more homework before passing half-truths!
Signed,
Former National Weather Service Electronics and Upper-Air Technician
Well anonymous, guess my knowledge of the weather business isn't as good as someone who worked in it. The person I know who used to launch balloons said they delivered the hydrogen from off-site and he thought that was commonplace. But thanks for the correction. Could you possibly name the sites where the NWS generates their own propellant?
Nevertheless, it doesn't change the premise here.
Hello there,
I am a small business that has the AN/TMQ-42 Hydrogen Generators designed and built by Bronzavia for the US Army in the late 90’s to provide hydrogen for weather balloons. They were never deployed due to environmental concerns over the methanol fuel source. They available for purchase and I think you would know an appropriate Artillery Force that would be most interested in acquiring them. There are 15 operational units and 4 more with their computer controls missing - ideal for parts… operational manual included. Please forward this memo to an appropriate officer who can make a decision on obtaining this rare equipment. We have proven one operational in an effort to convert them to operate on methane/natural gas in the attempt to operate on landfill gas. It has proven to be inefficient due to contaminant filtration requirements, so I have concluded they are best suited to the purpose for which they were designed. There are hourmeters on each unit showing test hours only, all the units are in excellent condition. Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Dan Swett
H2 GenTech
1733-C Monrovia Ave
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
949 642-3833 office
949 642-3837 fax
949 637-7126 cell
Post a Comment