Question one--
Can a woman who runs an ad saying her motivation for going to DC is to represent those people "still going to the porch, looking for the check" really be taken seriously?
Question two--
Can a man who just reinvented the definition of political pandering by apologizing for slavery be in any way outraged when his opponent calls him out for not advocating the removal of a statue of Nathan Bedford Forrest?
I think not, in both cases.
No comments:
Post a Comment